Skip to main content

Saraki may have gotten political solution to his problem

There was drama at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) yesterday when Senate President Bukola Saraki refused to move into the dock when his case was called.

The dock is where those standing trial stay during proceedings.

Saraki’s refusal to leave his seat for the dock led to an argument between his lead counsel, Mahmud Magaji (SAN), and the prosecutor, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN).

Objecting to Saraki’s action, Jacobs said it was the practice for an accused “irrespective” of his status to enter the dock during his trial.

According to him, once an accused person’s plea is taken, he/she must always sit in the dock during proceedings.

“Things must be done properly. The proper thing is for him to go to the dock,” Jacobs said.

Magaji said there was no need for Saraki to enter the dock, citing Section 22(m) of the Evidence Act to buttress his submission.

But, tribunal Chairman Justice Danladi Umar overruled him, directing him to prevail on Saraki to do the right thing.

Eventually, Saraki moved into the dock, shortly after, Jacobs sought an adjournment to enable the tribunal await the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the defendant’s appeal. The appeal court on Monday adjourned the verdict sine die (indefinitely).

Well, Saraki may have found a political solution to his case. How do you explain court of appeal adjourning his case indefinitely and Code of Conduct Tribunal postponing his trail to 5th and 6th of November 2015 to allow the court of appeal pass judgement on the case. The court of appeal used the word 'indefinitely'. So what is the assurance that the court would have pass judgement before the date CCT adjourned to? I suspect a foul play...

Please Share Your Thought In The Comment Box Below